Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Chandigarh vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

CEA/1/2020HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01037880201916 January 2020Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The dismissal was based on the appellant's statement that the tax effect involved was below the monetary limit prescribed by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. The Court granted the appellant liberty to file an application for revival of the appeal, should anything survive therein. Any pending applications related to the main case were also disposed of as a consequence of the dismissal of the main appeal.

Facts

The Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Chandigarh (appellant) filed an appeal before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana against Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (respondent). The appeal was filed concerning a GST matter. The learned counsel for the appellant stated that the tax effect involved in the case was below the monetary limit prescribed by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs in its letter dated August 22, 2019. Consequently, the appellant had instructions to withdraw the present appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn based on the appellant's submission regarding the tax effect being below the prescribed monetary limit. The appellant argued that the tax effect was less than the monetary limit stipulated in the letter F.No. 390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, and therefore, they wished to withdraw the appeal. The appellant also sought liberty to file an application for revival of the appeal if any issue survived. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CEA-1-2020(O&M) Date of decision : 16.01.2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER,

CGST COMMISSIONERATE, CHANDIGARH ...... APPELLANT VERSUS BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED ...... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN **** Present :- Mr. Ram Pal Kohle, Advocate for Mr.Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate for the appellant. **** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)

1.

Learned counsel for the appellant states that since the tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in letter bearing number F.No. 390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and customs, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein.

2.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

3.

Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE (AVNEESH JHINGAN ) 16th January, 2020 JUDGE shabha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable :

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.