Suraj vs. The Commissioner Of CGST Rohtak And Another
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 3.2.2020 CWP-33861-2019 (O&M) Suraj
...... Petitioner Versus The Commissioner of CGST, Rohtak & Another ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN *** Present : Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Inder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Sr. Standing counsel for the respondents. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) For detailed order see order of even date passed in CWP No.33844-2019 titled as “Rajeev vs. The Commissioner of CGST, Rohtak & Another.”
(AJAY TEWARI)
JUDGE (AVNEESH JHINGAN) JUDGE 3.2.2020 anuradha
Whether speaking/reasoned - Yes/No Whether reportable - Yes/No ANURADHA 2020.02.03 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.