M/S Mahavir Associates vs. Principal Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Commissioner And Another

CWP/16700/2020HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01078654202009 October 2020Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Court held that it was open to the petitioner to seek the statutory remedy of appeal as available in accordance with law. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Furthermore, the Court noted that it would be open for the petitioner to request for expeditious disposal of the appeal from the Appellate Authority. No specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules were discussed or interpreted, as the matter was disposed of on a procedural request for withdrawal.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Mahavir Associates, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Principal Commissioner, CGST, and another authority. The petition was filed on October 9, 2020. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge, as well as the amount in dispute, are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the filing of the writ petition is also not detailed.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide whether to grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner, through its counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal. The respondents' contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The core issue was whether the Court should permit the withdrawal of the writ petition and grant the petitioner the liberty to avail the appellate mechanism.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

115

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No. 16700 of 2020 Date of Decision: 9th October, 2020 M/s. Mahavir Associates

…Petitioner Versus Principal Commissioner, CGST & Another

…Respondents

CORAM : JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present : Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate for the Petitioner. *** Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:

1.

Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to seek statutory remedy of appeal as available to the petitioner in accordance with law.

2.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

3.

It will be open to the Petitioner to request for expeditious disposal of the appeal from the Appellate Authority.

( S. MURALIDHAR ) JUDGE

( AVNEESH JHINGAN ) JUDGE 9th October, 2020 Anjal Whether speaking/reasoned - Yes/No Whether reportable - Yes/No ANJAL GUPTA 2020.10.09 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.