Amandeep Singh Bhui vs. Inspector Preventive,Central Googs And Services Tax

CRM-M/29607/2021HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01064574202128 October 2021Bench: MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL7 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The High Court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. is an indefeasible statutory right and cannot be subjected to stringent conditions like deposit of money or bank guarantee. Such conditions are only permissible in discretionary bail under other sections of the Cr.P.C.

Facts

The petitioner was granted default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, but with stringent conditions including a large bail bond and a bank guarantee. The Additional Sessions Judge upheld these conditions. The petitioner challenged these conditions before the High Court.

Key Issues

Whether stringent conditions, including financial guarantees, can be imposed while granting default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. when the investigation is not completed within the stipulated period.

Sections Cited

Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., Section 132(1)(b), Section 132(1)(c), Section 132(1)(i), Section 132(1)(l)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-29607-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.10.2021

Amandeep Singh Bhui

... Petitioner Versus Inspector (Preventive) Central Goods and Service Tax.

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present: Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Senior Advocate, with

Mr. Aman Garg and Mr. Anurag Sharma, Advocates,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Sourabh Goel, Sr. Standing Counsel,

for the respondent.

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.

By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 15.07.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, whereby the prayer of the petitioner to set aside/modify stringent conditions imposed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana, while granting default bail to the petitioner under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., was declined.

The petitioner is an accused in a complaint under Section 132(1)(b)(c) and (I) punishable under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with corresponding Sections of Punjab SGST Act, 2017 and IGST Act, 2017. When the prosecuti

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.