Rajinder Singh vs. Inspector (Preventive) Of CGST Commissionerate, Ludhiana And Anr
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, Rajinder Singh, filed a petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Inspector (Preventive) of CGST Commissionerate, Ludhiana, and another. The specific tax period(s) and the order or action under challenge, along with the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. Similarly, the amount in dispute, if any, is not mentioned. The procedural history leading to this petition is also not elaborated upon in the given text.
Held
The Court granted the petitioner's request for permission to withdraw the present petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court also reserved liberty for the petitioner to re-access the Court in accordance with law, implying that this withdrawal does not preclude the petitioner from filing a fresh petition or pursuing other legal remedies if circumstances warrant. The reasoning for granting the withdrawal is not elaborated upon, but it is a standard procedural outcome when a party seeks to withdraw their case. No specific issues related to GST law were decided.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether to grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the present petition. The petitioner, through their counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The respondents, represented by their counsel, did not present any arguments against the withdrawal. The Court had to decide whether to grant this permission and dispose of the case accordingly. No specific provisions of the CGST Act or other laws were explicitly debated or relied upon by either side in the context of the withdrawal request.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36187 of 2021 (O & M) Date of Decision:-11.02.2022 Rajinder Singh
...Petitioner Versus Inspector (Preventive) of CGST Commissionerate, Ludhiana and another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
SURESHWAR THAKUR
Present:- Ms. Mansi Ghai, Advocate for Dr. Kanu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondent No.1-State. Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, AAG, Punjab. (Proceedings conducted through Video Conferencing) SURESHWAR THAKUR
J.(Oral)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Permission is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to re-access the Court in accordance with law. February 11, 2022
( SURESHWAR THAKUR) Vijay Asija JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No VIJAY ASIJA 2022.02.14 14:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.