Sahil Jain vs. Joint Commissioner (Preventive) Of CGST Commissionerate, Ludhiana

CRM-M/44008/2022HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01105354202223 September 2022Bench: MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court noted that the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present petition in view of a judgment dated March 3, 2021, passed by a Coordinate Bench of the High Court in a related matter. The Court accepted this request. Therefore, the Court decided to dismiss the petition as withdrawn. No specific findings were made on the merits of the original challenge to the conditions imposed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, as the petition was withdrawn before any such adjudication. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn.

Facts

The petitioner, Sahil Jain, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The petition sought modification of an order dated January 11, 2021, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana, under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C. This order had granted default bail to the petitioner but imposed certain conditions. The respondent in the petition was the Joint Commissioner (Preventive) of CGST Commissionerate, Ludhiana. The petitioner sought to withdraw the present petition in light of a previous judgment dated March 3, 2021, passed by a Coordinate Bench of the same High Court in a related matter titled Sahil Jain Vs. Joint Commissioner, CGST, Ludhiana.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for modification of an order granting default bail under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C. (mixed question of law and fact). Contentions: Petitioner: Relied on the judgment dated March 3, 2021, passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M-4374-2021 (Sahil Jain Vs. Joint Commissioner, CGST, Ludhiana) and sought permission to withdraw the present petition in view of that precedent. Respondent: No argument recorded for the respondent.

Sections Cited

Section 482, Section 167(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-44008-2022 Date of decision : 23.09.2022 Sahil Jain ...Petitioner Versus Joint Commissioner (Preventive) of CGST Commissionerate, Ludhiana. ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Ankur Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Sr. Standing Counsel, CBIC, Advocate for the respondent. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for modification of order dated 11.01.2021 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. challenging the conditions imposed while granting default bail to the petitioner. In view of judgment dated 03.03.2021 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M-4374-2021 titled as Sahil Jain Vs. Joint Commissioner, CGST, Ludhiana, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 23.09.2022 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2022.09.23 17:07 I attes

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.