Commissioner Of CGST, Panchkula vs. Nestle INDIA Limited
Original PDF →Facts
This case involves an appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST, Panchkula (appellant) against Nestle India Limited (respondent). The appeal was filed with a delay of 55 days, for which an application to condone the delay was filed and allowed. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, in its order dated 15.02.2023, referred to a detailed order passed on the same date in a connected case, STA-26-2019, also titled Commissioner of CGST, Panchkula vs. Nestle India Limited. The specific tax period(s) and the order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in this excerpt, nor is the amount in dispute.
Held
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, in its order dated 15.02.2023, allowed the application for condonation of delay of 55 days in refiling the appeal. The Court also noted that a detailed order of even date was passed in a connected appeal (STA-26-2019) concerning the same parties. The operative directions and the substantive findings on the merits of the case are not provided in this excerpt, as the Court indicated that the detailed order in the connected matter should be referred to for those aspects. Any pending applications were dismissed.
Key Issues
The provided excerpt does not detail the specific issues the Court had to decide, nor does it record the arguments presented by either the petitioner/appellant or the revenue/State. Consequently, the specific provisions of law, circulars, or precedents relied upon by the parties are also not mentioned. The excerpt only indicates that a detailed order was passed in a connected matter on the same date, which presumably contains the substantive analysis of the case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH STA-2-2020 (O&M) Date of decision:15.02.2023 Commissioner of CGST, Panchkula ....Appellant V/s. Nestle India Limited ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Senior Standing Counsel-CBEC with Mr. Deepesh Kakkar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Amrinder Singh, Advocate for the respondent. Ritu Bahri, J. (Oral). CM-23623-CII-2019
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 55 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. STA-2-2020 (O&M) For detailed order, kindly see order of even date passed in STA-26-2019 titled as Commissioner of CGST, Panchkula vs. Nestle India Limited. Pending application (if any) stands dismissed. (RITU BAHRI)
JUDGE (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE 15.02.2023
Divyanshi Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No DIVYANSHI 2023.02.22 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.