M/S Parsvnath Traders vs. Principal Commissioner CGST Panchkula And Another

CWP/10923/2021HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01050998202127 July 2023Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA12 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the deposits made by the petitioners were not voluntary self-assessments but were made under coercion during search proceedings. Since no show cause notice or adjudication order was issued, the revenue could not retain the amounts.

Facts

The petitioners deposited significant amounts of GST during searches by CGST officials, alleging bogus invoices and illegal ITC. They later requested a refund, which was rejected. The petitioners argued the deposits were made under coercion without proper procedure, while the revenue claimed they were voluntary admissions of guilt.

Key Issues

Whether deposits made under coercion during search proceedings, without a show cause notice or adjudication order, can be retained by the revenue or must be refunded.

Sections Cited

Section 74(1), Section 74(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

2023:PHHC:101688-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 228 Date of decision: 27.07.2023 1 CWP No.10923 of 2021 M/S PARSVNATH TRADERS

…. Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CGST AND ANOTHER …. Respondents 2 CWP No.10976 of 2021 M/S MAHAVIRA DYES & CHEMICALS

…. Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CGST AND ANOTHER

…. Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present : Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. **** MANISHA BATRA

, J.

This common order shall dispose of two above mentioned petitions which have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners making prayer for issuing writs of certiorari for quashing the orders dated 18.05.2021 whereby, the request of the petitioners of both petitions for grant of refund had been declined by respondent No.

1.

They have also made prayer for issuing writs of mandamus thereby, directing respondent No.1 to refund the amounts as mentioned in both these petitions. As common question of facts and law have arisen in these petit

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.