Ess Emm Komposit Works Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Division West 2 Gurugram
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s Ess Em Komposit Works Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The petition challenged an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division West 2, Gurugram. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to this writ petition is not detailed, other than the fact that the petitioner is now seeking to withdraw the present petition.
Held
The Court granted the petitioner liberty to withdraw the present writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court further held that if the petitioner prefers an appeal against the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division West 2, Gurugram, the question of limitation shall be examined on its merits. The appellate authority would be free to consider the pleas which the petitioner intends to take before it. The Court did not decide on the substantive merits of the case or the grounds for appeal, focusing solely on the procedural aspect of allowing withdrawal and the subsequent appellate process. No issues were expressly left undecided.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Whether, if liberty to withdraw is granted, the petitioner should be permitted to file an appeal against the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division West 2, Gurugram. The petitioner argued for the grant of liberty to withdraw the writ petition and to file an appeal. The respondent (Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division West 2, Gurugram) did not present any arguments as recorded in the judgment. The judgment does not explicitly state the specific legal provisions or precedents relied upon by the petitioner, beyond the general prayer for liberty to appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
CWP-16041-2024 127 IN TH M/S ESS EM ASSISTANT
CORAM: H
H Present: M
f SANJEEV P
Learned with lib concern
Granting withdraw
If such question petition
July 15, 2024 Mohit goyal
Whethe
Whethe 4 (O&M) **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAG **** Mr. Anuj Dewan, Advocate for the petitioner. **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
d counsel for the petitioner prays berty to file appeal against the ned. g him liberty to file appeal, presen wn. an appeal is preferred, the same n of limitation shall be examined w er would be free to take before the
(SANJ (J r speaking/reasoned?
Y r reportable?
Y AB AND HARYANA AT RH CWP-16041-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.07.2024 ATE LIMITED . . . . Petitioner VISION WEST 2 GURUGRAM . . . . Respondent NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA GMOHAN BANSAL ) to withdraw the present petition e order passed by the authority nt writ petition stands dismissed as shall be examined on merits. The with regard to the pleas which the appellate authority. JEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -1-
) 4 r t n y s e e MOHIT GOYAL 2024.07.16 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.