Ms Ivy Healthcare Infrastructure PVT LTD vs. The Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Jalandhar And Ors
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s Ivy Healthcare Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Commissioner, CGST Commissionarate, Jalandhar, and others. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Amrinder Singh, made a statement seeking permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. The reason provided for withdrawal was the need to file the petition again after making certain corrections. The Court noted the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Held
The Court held that the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty granted to the petitioner to file it again. The Court's decision was based on the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn with liberty to refile. No specific issues regarding GST provisions or amounts in dispute were decided as the petition was withdrawn at the outset.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to withdraw the present Writ Petition with the liberty to file it again after making necessary corrections? The petitioner argued that they require liberty to withdraw the Writ Petition to rectify certain errors and refile it. The revenue or State did not record any argument in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
108 IN TH M/S IVY HEA
THE COMMI OTHERS
CORAM: H
H
Present: M
* SANJEEV PR
L present Writ P be done in the 2. H the petitioner liberty aforesa
A September 20 Ess Kay
Whethe
Whethe HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR
CWP-2 Date of ALTHCARE INFRASTRUCTURE
V MISSIONER, CGST COMMISSIO
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ
Mr. Amrinder Singh, for the petit ***** RAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petition Petition with liberty to file it ag e same. Having regard to the statement m r, this Writ Petition stands dis aid. All pending applications also stan
(SANJ , 2024 r speaking/reasoned?
Y r reportable?
Y AB AND HARYANA AT RH 24212-2024 (O&M) f Decision:20.09.2024 E PVT. LTD.
..…...Petitioners (s) V/s. ONERATE, JALANDHAR AND …......Respondent(s) NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA NJAY VASHISTH tioner. ner prays for withdrawal of the gain as some correction needs to made by the learned counsel for smissed as withdrawn with the nd disposed of accordingly. JEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ) D ) e o r e Suresh Kumar 2024.09.20 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.