Principal Commissioner CGST Gurugram vs. M/S Bechtel INDIA Private Limited

STA/6/2024HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01119067202409 December 2024Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court allowed the application for withdrawal of the appeal. The Court noted the instructions from the counsel for the appellant stating their desire to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal itself was dismissed as withdrawn. Any pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. The Court did not delve into the substantive merits of the case or any specific GST provisions, as the appeal was withdrawn at the outset.

Facts

The appellant, Commissioner, CGST, Gurugram, filed an appeal (STA-6-2024) against M/s Bechte India Private Limited. The appellant, through their counsel, sought to withdraw the present appeal. An application for withdrawal (CM-18833-CII-2024) was also filed. The High Court was presented with these applications.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal filed by the appellant is maintainable for withdrawal? (Question of procedure/law) The appellant argued that they wished to withdraw the present appeal. The revenue's contention was not recorded as they were the ones seeking withdrawal. No specific provisions of the GST Act were explicitly discussed in relation to the withdrawal itself, beyond the procedural aspect of filing an application for it.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

STA-6-2024 (O 266 IN TH PRINCIPAL C M/S BECHTE CORAM: H

H Present M M

f SANJEEV P

C to withdraw th been filed for F

P

P accordingly.

09.12.

2024 Mohit goyal

1.

Whethe

2.

Whethe &M) **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ **** Mr. Suman Jain, Sr. Standing Cou Ms. Kiratbir Kaur , Advocate for the applicant/appellant. **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) Counsel for the appellant, upon i he present appeal. Application N withdrawal of the Appeal.

For the reasons stated in the appl Present Appeal i.e. STA-6-2024 i Pending application(s), if an

(SANJ er speaking/reasoned?

Y er reportable?

Y AB AND HARYANA AT RH CM-18833-CII-2024 in/and STA-6-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.12.2024 GRAM . . . . Appellant . . . . Respondent EEV PRAKASH SHARMA JAY VASHISTH unsel, CBIC with ) instructions, states that he wants No.CM-18833-CII-2024 has also lication, the same is allowed. is dismissed as withdrawn. ny, also stands disposed of JEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No

d )

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.