Commissioner, CGST Jalandhar vs. M/S Hyatt Resorts PVT LTD

Original PDF →
STA/25/2019HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01121116201927 January 2025Bench: MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

This matter came before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh as an appeal filed by the Commissioner, CGST, Jalandhar (appellant) against M/s Hyatt Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (respondent). The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history leading to this appeal before the High Court is not elaborated upon in the given text.

Held

The Court allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The reasoning provided is that the learned counsel for the appellant had specific instructions not to pursue the appeal further and therefore sought permission to withdraw it. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. No specific findings were made on any substantive GST-related issues, as the appeal was disposed of on a procedural ground. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.

Key Issues

The Court was not required to decide any substantive issues of law or fact. The sole matter before the Court was the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The appellant's counsel, acting on specific instructions, sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The respondent's arguments, if any, are not recorded in the judgment excerpt.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH STA-25-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.01.2025 Commissioner, CGST, Jalandhar …. Appellant Vs. M/s Hyatt Resorts Pvt. Ltd. ….. Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, Senior Standing counsel for the appellant. Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate, for the respondent. ARUN PALLI, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant submits, for he has specific instructions not to pursue the appeal any further, he be permitted to withdraw the same. Dismissed as withdrawn. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (SUDEEPTI SHARMA)

JUDGE 27.01.2025 deepak Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2025.01.28 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.