Pawan Kumar vs. Inspector (Preventive) Of CGST Commissionerate, Ludhiana
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, filed a petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondent was the Inspector (Preventive) of CGST Commissionerate, Ludhiana. The petition was filed seeking certain relief. The tax period and the specific order or action under challenge are not explicitly detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history leading to this High Court filing is not elaborated upon.
Held
The Court held that the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the present petition. In light of this request, the Court allowed the withdrawal. The reasoning provided is that the petitioner themselves sought to withdraw the case. Therefore, the operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn. No specific findings on any GST-related legal issues were made, as the case was disposed of on the procedural ground of withdrawal. The Court did not address any substantive GST matters.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition should be granted. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the present petition. The respondent's arguments or contentions are not recorded in the judgment excerpt. No specific provisions of the CGST Act or Rules were discussed in relation to the withdrawal of the petition.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 289 CRM-M-11533-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.04.2025. Pawan Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus Inspector (Preventive) of CGST Commissionerate, Ludhiana ...Respondent. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Nitin Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR
, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 28.04.2025. Komal
Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.04.28 13:03 I attest to the accuracy of this document
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.