Commissioner Of Central Excise, Ldh. vs. M/S Abc Papers Saila Khurad, Hoshiarpur
Original PDF →Facts
The Commissioner CGST & CE Commissionerate, Jalandhar (appellant) filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the Final Order No.126-129/2010 EX (DB) dated 02.02.2010, passed by the Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. The respondent is M/s ABC Paper. The appeal pertains to a matter where the tax effect involved was stated to be under Rs.2 crores. The appellant's counsel submitted instructions to withdraw the appeal in view of a specific circular.
Held
The Court accepted the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The reasoning was based on the appellant's instruction to withdraw the appeal due to the tax effect being under Rs.2 crores, as per Circular No.9 of 2024. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn. No specific issues were decided on merits, and pending applications were disposed of.
Key Issues
1. Whether the appeal, involving a tax effect under Rs.2 crores, is maintainable in light of Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CBDT, Government of India? The appellant argued that as the tax effect involved in the appeal is under Rs.2 crores, they have specific instructions to withdraw the appeal in view of Circular No.9 of 2024. The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the respondent.
Sections Cited
Section 35G
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
S. No.210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
****
CEA No.25 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:07.07.2025 Commissioner CGST & CE Commissionerate, Jalandhar .....Appellant Vs. M/s ABC Paper, Shaila Khurad, Hoshiarpur
.....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present:- Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Viraj Gandhi, Advocate for the respondent. **** Lisa Gill, J. (Oral)
Present appeal has been filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging Final Order No.126-129/2010 EX (DB) dated 02.02.2010, passed by Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, in Excise Appeal No.1734 of 2009. 2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that as the tax effect involved in this appeal is under Rs.2 crores, he has specific instructions to withdraw this appeal in view of circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CBDT, Government of India.
Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. ( LISA GILL ) JUDGE (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE July 07, 2025 renu Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RENU 2025.07.10 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.