Suresh Batheja vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, Suresh Batheja, filed a writ petition before the Punjab & Haryana High Court challenging an order dated 31.01.2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Chandigarh. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The respondent was the Union of India and others. The tax period and the amount in dispute were not specified in the judgment. The procedural history involved the filing of the writ petition and the subsequent decision to withdraw it.
Held
The Court held that the petitioner should be allowed to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's request to pursue the statutory appeal already filed against the order dated 31.01.2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Chandigarh. The ratio decidendi is that a party can withdraw a writ petition if they intend to pursue a statutory remedy that has already been invoked. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue a statutory appeal. The petitioner argued that they had filed a statutory appeal against the impugned order and wished to withdraw the writ petition to pursue that appeal. The respondents did not record any specific arguments against the withdrawal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
( Sr. No. 119 )
CWP No.16171 of 2025
Date of decision: 07.07.2025
Suresh Batheja .....Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sourabh Goel, Senior Standing Counsel
for the respondents.
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal filed by him against the order dated 31.01.2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Chandigarh. (2)
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(DEEPAK SIBAL)
JUDGE
2025
( LAPITA BANERJI ) sunil yadav
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SUNIL YADAV 2025.07.09 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.