M/S Raks Exim Services Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner, Division North Of CGST Faridabad, Office Of The Commissioner,And Others
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/S RAKS EXIM SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, challenged a show cause notice dated June 28, 2025, issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Division North of CGST, Faridabad. The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that a final order had been passed subsequent to the filing of the writ petition. Consequently, the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition and avail the statutory remedies available to challenge the final order. The respondents are the Assistant Commissioner, Division North of CGST, Faridabad, and others.
Held
The Court held that the writ petition challenging the show cause notice has become infructuous because a final order has been passed. The Court reasoned that once a final order is issued, the challenge to the show cause notice that preceded it becomes moot. The petitioner's request to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail statutory remedies was granted. The operative direction was to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies against the final order. No specific issues were expressly left undecided.
Key Issues
1. Whether the writ petition challenging the show cause notice dated June 28, 2025, has become infructuous due to the passing of a final order. The petitioner argued that the writ petition has become infructuous as a final order has been passed. Therefore, they sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue statutory remedies against the final order. The respondents' contentions were not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
127
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-26704-2025
Date of Decision: January 19, 2026
M/S RAKS EXIM SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ....Petitioner
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DIVISION NORTH OF CGST FARIDABAD AND OTHERS
..... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
Present: Mr. Rohit Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Singh Bhattian, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Sidhi Bansal, Advocate for the respondents.
**** LISA GILL, J.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this writ petition, whereby show cause notice dated 28.06.2025 has been challenged, is rendered infructuous at this stage, as final order has been passed. Therefore, petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail statutory remedy(ies) available to it for challenging the same in accordance with law.
Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned.
(LISA GILL)
JUDGE
(RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) January 19, 2026
JUDGE Rts
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RITU SHARMA 2026.01.21 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.