Rajesh Kumar vs. Commissioner CGST Appeals Panchkula Commissionerate And Anr
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Commissioner (CGST Appeals), Panchkula, and another Commissioner. The specific tax period(s) and the order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided text. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history indicates that the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition.
Held
The Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Court's decision was based on the petitioner's expressed desire to withdraw and refile the petition with better particulars. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. No specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules were discussed in relation to the merits of any dispute, as the matter was disposed of on a procedural point.
Key Issues
The Court was not required to decide any substantive legal issues. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The core question before the Court was whether to grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition. The petitioner's counsel argued for withdrawal, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition after making improvements. The respondents' arguments are not recorded in the provided text.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE RAJESH KUMA
COMMISSIONE ANR CORAM : H
H Present : M
M
DEEPAK SIB
L petition with particulars.
D
2026 Prince
Whether speak Whether repor
Sr. No.116-1
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH
CWP-21 Date of AR
Versus ER (CGST APPEALS), PANCHKULA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. Abhay Pratap Singh Chauhan, Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate for th *** BAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitio liberty to file a fresh petition Dismissed as withdrawn with libe
(DEEPA
J (LAPIT
J
king/reasoned :
Yes/No rtable :
Yes/No B AND HARYANA AT H 1451-2025 f Decision : 01.04.2026 …PETITIONER A COMMISSIONERATE AND …RESPONDENTS AK SIBAL A BANERJI , Advocate for the petitioner. e respondents. oner seeks to withdraw this n after giving therein better erty as prayed for. AK SIBAL) JUDGE
TA BANERJI) JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2026.04.02 09:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.