Srss Agro PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors

Original PDF →
CWP/24602/2025HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01131715202509 April 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, SRSS Agro Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The petition challenged an order passed by the respondents under Rule 96(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the filing of the writ petition is also not detailed.

Held

The Court held that the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and to challenge the order passed by the respondent(s) under Rule 96(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, was permissible. The Court granted the liberty as prayed for. The reasoning is that the petitioner has the right to withdraw their petition and pursue their remedies afresh. No specific findings were made on the merits of the underlying challenge to the order under Rule 96(1) as the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The ratio decidendi is that a party can withdraw a writ petition with liberty to refile, provided the court grants such liberty. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn with liberty.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner can withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and to challenge the order passed by the respondent(s) under Rule 96(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner, through its counsel, sought to withdraw the petition with the aforementioned liberty. Respondents' Contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments or contentions from the respondents regarding the withdrawal of the petition.

Sections Cited

Rule 96(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Sr. No. 232 (11)

CWP No. 24602 of 2025

Date of decision: 09.04.2026

SRSS Agro Pvt. Ltd. .....Petitioner

Versus Union of India and others .....Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

Present : Dr. Avinash Poddar, Advocate (appeared through VC) and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

* * *

DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1)

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action as also to challenge therein the order passed by the respondent(s) under Rule 96(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. (2)

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

( DEEPAK SIBAL )

JUDGE

09.04.

2026

( LAPITA BANERJI ) sunil yadav

JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SUNIL YADAV 2026.04.10 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.