Prem Engineering Work vs. Commissioner CGST, Gurugram West Ii And Another
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
IN THE PREM ENGIN COMMISSION
CORAM : H
H Present : M
M
DEEPAK SIB
L petition with l also to challen
D
2026 Prince
Whether speak Whether repor
Sr. No.132
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH
CWP-3 Date of NEERING WORK
Versus NER CGST, GURUGRAM WE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. Sidharth Malhotra, Advocate Ms. Sidhi Bansal, Advocate for the *** BAL, J. (Oral) earned counsel for the petitio liberty to file a fresh petition on nge therein the notification No.56 Dismissed as withdrawn with libe
(DEEPA
J (LAPIT
J
king/reasoned :
Yes/No rtable :
Yes/No B AND HARYANA AT H 3631-2025(O&M) f Decision : 30.04.2026 …PETITIONER EST II AND ANOTHER …RESPONDENTS AK SIBAL A BANERJI for the petitioner. e respondents.
oner seeks to withdraw this n the same cause of action as 6 dated 28.12.2023. erty as prayed for. AK SIBAL) JUDGE
TA BANERJI) JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2026.05.01 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.