Manimahesh Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA And Others
Original PDF →CWP/16657/2026HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01089943202625 May 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI2 pages
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
CWP-16657-2
IN THE
M/s Manimahe
Union of India
CORAM : H
H
Present :
M
M
fo
M
fo
DEEPAK SIB
L
stage, he woul
direction to
respondent No
(Annexure P-5
2.
L
notice, has no
3.
A
of the case, th
No.2 to take a
P-5), made on
affording opp
2026 (O&M)
Sr. No.153
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB
CHANDIGARH
CWP-166
Date of De
esh Enterprises
Versus
a and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEE
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPI
Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Senior Advo
Ms. Ambika, Advocate,
or the petitioner.
Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Sr. Panel C
or the respondents-CGST.
***
BAL, J. (Oral)
earned Senior counsel for the p
ld be satisfied if the present writ
the Deputy Commissioner, C
o.2 to take a decision on the rep
5), made on behalf of the petition
earned counsel for the responde
objection if the above prayer is a
Accordingly, at this stage, witho
he writ petition is disposed of w
a decision on the representation
behalf of the petitioner, by pass
portunity of hearing to autho
Page 1 of 2
B AND HARYANA AT
H
657-2026 (O&M)
ecision : 25.05.2026
…Petitioner
…Respondents
EPAK SIBAL
ITA BANERJI
cate with
Counsel,
petitioner submits that at this
t petition is disposed of with a
CGST Division-I, Bathinda-
presentation dated 08.04.2026
ner.
ents, who appears on advance
accepted.
out commenting on the merits
with a direction to respondent
dated 08.04.2026 (Annexure
ing a speaking order and after
orized representative of the
VANDANA
2026.05.27 19:00
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP-16657-2
petitioner com
of receipt of a
4.
N
the petitioner a
would be at lib
May 25, 2026
vandana
Whether speak
Whether repor
2026 (O&M)
mpany preferably within a period
copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision and if the decision is not to the s berty to challenge the same, in ac
(DEEP
J (LAPI
J
6
king/reasoned :
Y rtable :
Y d of two weeks from the date so taken be communicated to satisfaction of the petitioner, it ccordance with law. PAK SIBAL) JUDGE ITA BANERJI) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No VANDANA 2026.05.27 19:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.