Manimahesh Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA And Others

Original PDF →
CWP/16657/2026HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01089943202625 May 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI2 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
CWP-16657-2 IN THE M/s Manimahe Union of India CORAM : H H Present : M M fo M fo DEEPAK SIB L stage, he woul direction to respondent No (Annexure P-5 2. L notice, has no 3. A of the case, th No.2 to take a P-5), made on affording opp 2026 (O&M) Sr. No.153 E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CWP-166 Date of De esh Enterprises Versus a and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPI Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Senior Advo Ms. Ambika, Advocate, or the petitioner. Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Sr. Panel C or the respondents-CGST. *** BAL, J. (Oral) earned Senior counsel for the p ld be satisfied if the present writ the Deputy Commissioner, C o.2 to take a decision on the rep 5), made on behalf of the petition earned counsel for the responde objection if the above prayer is a Accordingly, at this stage, witho he writ petition is disposed of w a decision on the representation behalf of the petitioner, by pass portunity of hearing to autho Page 1 of 2 B AND HARYANA AT H 657-2026 (O&M) ecision : 25.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents EPAK SIBAL ITA BANERJI cate with Counsel, petitioner submits that at this t petition is disposed of with a CGST Division-I, Bathinda- presentation dated 08.04.2026 ner. ents, who appears on advance accepted. out commenting on the merits with a direction to respondent dated 08.04.2026 (Annexure ing a speaking order and after orized representative of the VANDANA 2026.05.27 19:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16657-2 petitioner com of receipt of a 4. N the petitioner a would be at lib May 25, 2026 vandana Whether speak Whether repor 2026 (O&M) mpany preferably within a period

copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision and if the decision is not to the s berty to challenge the same, in ac

(DEEP

J (LAPI

J

6

king/reasoned :

Y rtable :

Y d of two weeks from the date so taken be communicated to satisfaction of the petitioner, it ccordance with law. PAK SIBAL) JUDGE ITA BANERJI) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No VANDANA 2026.05.27 19:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.