M/S. Precot Meridian LTD. vs. The Commissioner Of Customs
Held
The Court held that circulars cannot override statutory provisions and that the explanation of drawback provisions does not affect IGST refund entitlement. The petitioner is entitled to the IGST refund.
Facts
The petitioner, an exporter, paid IGST on zero-rated supplies and sought a refund. The respondents denied the refund based on a circular stating that claiming duty drawback relinquishes IGST/ITC claims.
Key Issues
Whether a circular can deny a statutory refund of IGST paid on exports, and if the petitioner is entitled to the refund despite claiming duty drawback.
Sections Cited
Section 16(3), Section 54
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus,
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.