M/S.Sanmar Matrix Metals LTD vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise
Held
The Court did not express any view on the merits of the claim. It directed the Respondent to dispose of the petitioner's pending representations on merits and in accordance with law within eight weeks.
Facts
The petitioner, an exporter, sought re-credit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to Rs. 15,14,498/- that was rejected. The petitioner argued that the rejected ITC should be re-credited as per Rule 93(2) of the CGST Rules and Circular No. 59/33/2018.
Key Issues
Whether the rejected Input Tax Credit should be re-credited to the electronic credit ledger and whether the petitioner was afforded a proper opportunity of hearing before rejection.
Sections Cited
Rule 93(2), Section 73, Section 74, Section 16(1), Section 16(2), Section 16(3)(a), Section 54(3), Section 17(1), Section 17(2), Section 17(5)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
This writ petition is filed seeking for a w
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.