Thamarai Selvan K vs. The Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise

Original PDF →
WP(MD)/10850/2025HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01047656202523 April 2025Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH6 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
W.P.(MD)No.10850 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH W.P.(MD)No.10850 of 2025 K.Thamaraiselvan, Proprietor of M/s.Thamarai Enterprises. ... Petitioner -vs- The Superintendent of CGST and Central Excise, Ariyalur Range, Tirichirapalli II Division, Trichy. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the respondent in Reference No ZA330923053034U dated 13/09/2023 and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, and direct the respondents to revoke the cancellation of petitioners GSTN registration No 33ARAPT6032C1Z8 within such time as may be directed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karunakar For Respondent : Mr.R.Nandakumar ____________ 1 / 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.10850 of 2025

ORDER (GST) and others [(2022) 99 GSIR 386], wherein, under identical ____________ 2 / 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis circumstances, this Court has directed the revocation of cancellation of registration subject to conditions.

5.

This Court has been consistently following the directions issued in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center's case [cited supra]. The relevant portion of the order is extracted hereunder:- ''229. In the light of the above discussion, these Writ Petitions are allowed subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioners are directed to file their returns for the period prior to the cancellation of registration, if such returns have not been already filed, together with tax defaulted which has not been paid prior to cancellation along with interest for such belated payment of tax and fine and fee fixed for belated filing of returns for the defaulted period under the provisions of the Act, within a period of forty five (45) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if it has not been already paid. ii. It is made clear that such payment of Tax, Interest, fine / fee and etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of these petitioners. iii. If any Input Tax Credit has remained utilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or a ____________ 3 / 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis competent officer of the Department. iv. Only such approved Input Tax Credit shall be allowed for being utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rule. v. The petitioners shall also pay GST and file the returns for the period subsequent to the cancellation of the registration by declaring the correct value of supplies and payment of GST shall also be in cash. vi. If any Input Tax Credit was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondents or any other competent authority. vii. The respondents may also impose such restrictions / limitation on petitioners as may be warranted to ensure that there is no undue passing of Input Tax Credit pending such exercise and to ensure that there is no violation or an attempt to do bill trading by taking advantage of this order. viii. On payment of tax, penalty and uploading of returns, the registration shall stand revived forthwith. ix. The respondents shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi, to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow these petitioners to file their returns and to pay the tax/penalty/fine. x. The above exercise shall be carried out by the respondents within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ____________ 4 / 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis xi. No cost. xii. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.''

6.

In view thereof, the benefit extended by this Court vide its earlier order in Suguna Cutpiece Center's case [cited supra], may be extended to the petitioner.

7.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of on the above terms. No costs. NCC : Yes / No

23.04.

2025 Index : Yes / No sm To:- The Superintendent of CGST and Central Excise, Ariyalur Range, Tirichirapalli II Division, Trichy. ____________ 5 / 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis VIVEK KUMAR SINGH

, J.

sm

23.04.

2025 ____________ 6 / 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.