M/S. Aadi Shakte Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA

WP/23644/2022HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01054371202202 December 2022Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR2 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. MOHAMMED SHAKEEB M. MULLA., ADVOCATE
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court placed the submission of the learned counsel on record. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, while explicitly reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file a fresh petition. No specific findings were made on the merits of the notice issued under Section 79 of the CGST Act, as the petition was withdrawn before such adjudication.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Aadi Shakte Enterprises, a sole proprietorship, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court. The petition challenged a notice dated October 21, 2022, issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Hospet Division (Respondent No. 2), under Section 79 of the CGST Act. The Union of India and the State Bank of India were also impleaded as respondents. The petitioner sought to quash the said notice. The matter was listed for orders before the Court.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the notice dated October 21, 2022, issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax under Section 79 of the CGST Act, was valid and liable to be quashed. The petitioner, through its learned counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The Court was to decide whether to grant this request and dispose of the petition accordingly. The petitioner's contention was to withdraw the petition. The respondents' arguments, if any, are not recorded in the judgment.

Sections Cited

Section 79

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

WRIT PETITION No.23644 OF 2022 (T-RES)

BETWEEN:

M/S. AADI SHAKTE ENTERPRISES (A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN) PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT: ANJANEYA COLONY, DOOR NO.1/2, BHUVANAHALLI, GADIGANUR POST HOSAPETE, BALLARI (BELLARY) KARNATAKA – 588 223. REPRESENTED BY THE AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROPRIETOR MR. SOVIT MISHRA S/O VINAY KUMAR MISHRA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS RESIDING AT: HOUSE NO. M-2ND A- 393 ADA COLONY, NAINI ALLAHABAD – 211 008. UTTAR PRADESH. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMMED SHAKEEB M. MULLA., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

UNION OF INDIA

THROUGH SECRETARY,

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,

NEW DELHI.

2.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX

HOSPET DIVISION

OFFICE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

OF CENTRAL TAX HOSPET DIVISION

SECOND FLOOR AXIS CITY CENTRE

ABOVE MAX SHOWROOM

COLLEGE ROAD, HOSAPET – 583 201. 2

3.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER

04, KUTCHETY ROAD, ALLAHABAD

UTTAR PRADESH – 211 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.