M/S Vedanta Limited vs. Union Of INDIA

Original PDF →
WP/9710/2024HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01019077202401 April 2024Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR2 pages
For Petitioner: SRI AJAY J N, ADVOCATE

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:13284 WP No. 9710 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 9710 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/s. VEDANTA LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (NOW COMPANIES ACT, 2013) HAVING ADDRESS AT: 7TH FLOOR, No.703 AND 704, No.30 PRESTIGE MERIDEIN II M G ROAD, NEAR MEYAL BENGALURU URBAN KARNATAKA – 560 001. REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MANAGER M S SHEFALI ARORA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI AJAY J N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI – 110 001. 2. GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COUNCIL THROUGH THE SECRETARY 5TH FLOOR, TOWER II JEEVAN BHARTI BUILDING JANPATH ROAD, CONNAUGHT PLACE NEW DELHI - 110 001. 3. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:13284 WP No. 9710 of 2024 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE No. 137, NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI – 110 001. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARING THAT THE ACTIVITY OF A HOLDING COMPANY PROVIDING A CORPORATE GUARANTEE TO A SUBSIDIARY IS NOT IN THE NATURE OF SUPPLY AND /OR SUPPLY OF SERVICE TAXABLE UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE CGST ACT AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under;

“The undersigned craves leave to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to assert its cause of action as permissible under law, in the interests of justice and equity”

The memo is placed on record. In terms of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE

GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 77

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.