M/S Venkob Yadav vs. Principal Commissioner And Ors

Original PDF →
WP/201611/2024HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC03003212202423 September 2024Bench: SURAJ GOVINDARAJ5 pages
For Petitioner: SRI.DEVI PRASAD GANPATRAO, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI.GIRISH HULIMANI, ADVOCATE

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC-K:7232 WP No. 201611 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.201611 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S VENKOB YADAV 1-147 MANGALORE TQ. SHORAPUR, YADGIR-585224 REPRESNETED BY ITS PROPIETOR SRI.VENKOB YADAV S/O YENKAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI.DEVI PRASAD GANPATRAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CE NO.71, CLUB ROAD BELAGAVI-590001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE YADGIR RANGE H.NO.5-1-41/8 HASNAIN MANZIL OPP.OMAR FAROOQ MASJID MILAT NAGAR, YADGIR-585202. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CE, NO.71, CLUB ROAD BELAGAVI-590001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.GIRISH HULIMANI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by BASALINGAPPA SHIVARAJ DHUTTARGAON Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC-K:7232 WP No. 201611 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, OR SUCH OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED SCN SL.NO. 225/2021 ST (COMM) DATED 21.04.2021 IN ANNEXURE-A.B) QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN OIO SL.NO. BEL-EXCUS-COM-MG-67-2023-24-ST DATED 15.11.2023 AT ANNEXURE-D PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1.C) QUASH THE CORRIGENDUM TO THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 IN C.NO. V/SER/15/ 284/2021 ST DATED 02.02.2023 AT ANNEXURE-CD) QUASH THE RECOVERY NOTICE O.C.NO.84/2024 DATED 26.03.2024 AT ANNEXURE-E.E) PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER, MAKE SUCH OTHER DIRECTION OR WRIT AS THIS HONOURABLE HIGH COURT MAY DEEM FIT AND APPROPRIATE IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)

1.

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ of certiorari, or such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble court may deem fit and quash the impugned SCN Sl.No. 225/2021 ST (Comm) dated 21.04.2021 in Annexure-A. b. Quash the impugned order in OIO Sl.No. BEL-EXCUS-COM-MG-67-2023-24-ST dated NC: 2024:KHC-K:7232

15.11.

2023 at Annexure-D passed by respondent No.1. c. Quash the corrigendum to the show cause notice issued by respondent No.1 in O.C.No.V/SER/15/284/2021 ST dated 02.02.2023 at Annexure-C. d. Quash the Recovery Notice O.C.No. 84/2024 dated 26.03.2024 at Annexure-E. e. Pass such other order, make such other direction or writ as this Hon’ble High Court may deem fit and appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.

2.

Both the counsels submit that the lis involved in the present matter has been decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by its order dated 03.07.2024 in the case of M/s Karnataka Chinmaya Seva Trust vs. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax and Another in W.P.No.11154/2023 and other connected matters, the same is extracted hereunder: “In light of observations made above, the writ petitions relating to challenge to show- cause notice, such matters will stand relegated to the officers to be designated in terms of the observations made in para 8 above, at the NC: 2024:KHC-K:7232 same stage. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.Nos.1 to 5 in Column No.1 of the table relating to challenge to show-cause notice are disposed off. Insofar as such writ petitions as detailed in Column 2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original, in light of the discussion made above, the Orders-in-Original stand set aside and the matters are relegated to the officers to be designated to be reconsidered from the stage of show-cause notice. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 35 in Column No.2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original are disposed off. The petitioners who are now relegated before the authorities concerned are at liberty to file their pleadings within a reasonable time as may be fixed by the Officers concerned. Wherever the matters are pending in appeal in light of the arrangement that is made, petitioners to file a memo for withdrawal of appeal and accordingly, the Orders-in-Original in question would also receive the same treatment, i.e, be set aside as per the directions made above. Wherever demands have been made pursuant to the impugned orders, such proceedings are also set aside.”

3.

In that view of the matter, I pass the following; NC: 2024:KHC-K:7232 ORDER i. Writ Petition is partly-allowed. ii. The above matter is relegated to the officers to be designated in terms of the observation made in paragraph No.8 of the order dated 03.07.2024 in the case of M/s Karnataka Chinmaya Seva Trust vs. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax and Another in W.P.No.11154/2023 and other connected matters, the petitioner is permitted to file his reply to the show cause notice, which shall be considered by the said officers in accordance with law within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

VNR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9 CT: RBM

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.