M/S Sai Shakti Agency vs. The Office Of The Assistant Commissioners And Anr
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash a notice issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and to direct the respondent to consider their representation. A memo was subsequently filed seeking to withdraw the petition.
Held
The Court accepted the memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The Court noted that the petitioner intended to avail benefits under an amended provision of the CGST Act.
Key Issues
The primary issue was the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The court also acknowledged the petitioner's intention to seek benefits under a specific section of the CGST Act.
Sections Cited
Section 16
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
A memo is filed seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition.
The memo is accepted with all just exceptions, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
It is stated that the petitioner intends to avail the benefits under amended Sub Section 5 of Section 16 of CGST Act. The petitioner is entitled to the benefit under the aforementioned provision, if provision has conferred any such benefit. (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
THM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.