M/S. Ika INDIA Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: “issue a writ or order in the nature of certiorari, mandamus directing the 4th respondent to consider the representation dated 10.07.2024 (Annexure-A) and sanction refund of IGST of Rs.49,27,808/- paid on the goods exported, in terms of Rule 96(1) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 r/w Section 16 of Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 with interest under Section 56 of CGST/KGST Act, 2017”
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
It is the grievance of the petitioner that his representation dated 10.07.2024 at Annexure-A submitted to the respondents has not been considered so far by them nor any order has been passed on the same. Under these circumstances, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition. NC: 2025:KHC:10600 WP No. 4523 of 2025
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is given, they would consider and pass necessary order on the said representation.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and rival submissions, the respondents are hereby directed to address the grievances of the petitioner and consider its representation dated 10.07.2024 at Annexure-A and pass appropriate order/take appropriate decision in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.