M/S Vijay Electricals vs. The Deputy Commissioner
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Ashok A.Kulkarni., and Sri.H.R.Kambiyavar., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Gangadhar J.M., AAG along with Smt.Kirtilata R.Patil., HCGP for respondents have appeared in person.
The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 16.10.2023 bearing Ref:DCCT/AUD-5/HUB/US-73/ORDER/2023-24/B-198 issued by the first respondent under Section 73 of the Karnataka Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 for the tax period 2018-19 vide Annexure-C and Form DRC-07 bearing reference No. ZD291023019327L dated 16.10.2023 for the tax period 2018- 19 vide Annexure-D as being in violation of the provisions of the KGST and CGST Act and hence unsustainable.
Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. NC: 2025:KHC-D:5194 WP No. 100369 of 2024
As against the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, there is an alternate and statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 107 of Karnataka Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Hence, I decline to exercise power under writ juri iction.
Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. The petitioner may approach the First Appellate Authority, if so advised. The Authority may consider the time spent by the petitioner before this Court while entertaining the appeal. Two weeks’ time is granted to the petitioner to file an appeal before the First Appellate Authority. (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP/RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 30
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.