M/S Lawraga Metals Private Limited vs. State Of Karnataka
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
Smt. Jyothi M. Maradi, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent No.1. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i. “Issue a Writ of Certiorari or Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order passed u/s 86A R/w 16 of the KGST/CGST Act, blocking credit ledger of the Petitioner at ANNEXURE-C vide order No:14/2024-25 (86-A), dt: 16/4/2025 passed by the Respondent-2 in so far as the petitioner is concerned.
ii. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order passed u/s 86A R/w HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23771 16 of the KGST/CGST Act, blocking credit ledger of the Petitioner at ANNEXURE-D vide order No: 13/2024-25 (86-A), dt: 10/03/2025 passed by the Respondent-2 in so far as the petitioner is concerned.
iii. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order passed u/s 86A R/w 16 of the KGST/CGST Act, blocking credit ledger of the Petitioner at ANNEXURE-E vide order No:02/2024-25 (86-A), dt: 4/01/2025 passed by the Respondent-2 in so far as the petitioner is concerned.
iv. Issue Writ of Mandamus or Writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the resp-2 to withdraw the negative blocking of the Electronic credit ledger of the petitioner as per ANNEXURE F, in so for as the petitioner is concerned.
v. Issue Writ of Mandamus or Writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the resp-2 to permit to file the returns for the period 2025 without payment of tax, in so for as the petitioner is concerned.
vi. Issue any other directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to pass in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity including the cost of the Writ Petition.”
Both the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGA for the respondents-State submits that lis in the present matter is covered by the order of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of K-9- HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23771 ENTERPRISES Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER.1
In that view of the matter, I pass the following: ORDER i) The writ petition is allowed. ii) Certiorari is issued, the order dated 16.04.2025 at Annexure-C, the order dated 10.03.2025 at Annexure-D and the order dated 04.01.2025 at Annexure-E, are quashed. iii) A mandamus is issued directing the respondents to unblock the Electronic Credit Ledger of the petitioner at Annexure-F within a period of two weeks’ from today to enable the petitioner to file returns. iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the respondents to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law and in terms of the order of the 1 W.A.NO.100425/2023 and other connected matters DD 02.04.2024. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23771 Division Bench in WA.100425/2023 and other connected matters. (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.