The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a) “The Petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to declare and strike down Section 16(2)(aa) of the CGST/SGST Acts as being unconstitutional, the same being violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
b) The Petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to declare and strike down Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST/SGST Acts as being unconstitutional, the same being violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
c) This Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the Fourth Respondent to permit the Petitioner to avail the benefit of input tax credit in respect of the purchases effected from the supplier, M/s.SK Trading Company, the Fifth Respondent made prior to the order dated 20-07-2023 passed in the case of the supplier (Annexure - "G"). No:2A360723039291M
d) This Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to issue such other writ or writs or directions in the nature of a writ as this Hon'ble High Court may deem it fir to grant in the facts and circumstances of the petitioner’s case”
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the above petition to file an appropriate petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Telangana since respondent No.4 is an Officer, who functions from Hyderabad in Telangana. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23773 WP No. 17628 of 2025
Reserving such liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.