BharatTaxGST

M/S Shivanand Patil vs. The Office Of The Assistant Commissioners Central Tax And Anr

Original PDF →
WP/200178/2023HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC03000419202302 September 2025Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. SANDEEP VIJAYKUMAR, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: NOTICE TO R1 “NEITHER COVER NOR ACK RECEIVED SO FAR”; SRI. SHESHADRI JAISHANKAR M., AGA FOR R2

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:5061 WP No. 200178 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO.200178 OF 2023 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S SHIVANAND PATIL S/O KASHINATH RAO PATIL, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: CONTRACTOR, R/O H.NO. 8-9-90, J. P. NAGAR, BEHIND POLY COLLEGE, BIDAR, TQ. & DIST. BIDAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANDEEP VIJAYKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONERS CENTRAL TAX (CGST) & CENTRAL EXCISE, GULBARGA DIVISION, BEHIND TV STATION, REVANSIDDESHWAR COLONY, KALABURAGI-585104. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES LVO-540, KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICE TAXES, OFFICE, BIDAR-585401. …RESPONDENTS (BY NOTICE TO R1 “NEITHER COVER NOR ACK RECEIVED SO FAR”; SRI. SHESHADRI JAISHANKAR M., AGA FOR R2) Digitally signed by VARSHA N RASALKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:5061 WP No. 200178 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

Sri.Sandeep Vijaykumar., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Sheshadri Jaishankar.M., AGA for respondent No.2 have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be taken on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order or file review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:5061 WP No. 200178 of 2023

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

MRP/VNR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.