M/S Indus Diagnostics Imaging PVT LTD vs. The Union Of INDIA

Original PDF →
WP/18546/2024HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01038262202414 October 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR2 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. HARISH V. S., ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. HEMA KUMAR, AGA

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40847 WP No. 18546 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 18546 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S INDUS DIAGNOSTICS AND IMAGING PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO 325, FIRST FLOOR, 8TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS, BTM 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 076 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR VENKATESH D., S/O MR. DEVAPPAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISH V. S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, 128-A, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY 2. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX BENGALURU WEST COMMISSIONERATE, BMTC BUILDING 1ST FLOOR, BANASHANKARI, KANAKAPURA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 070 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HEMA KUMAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40847 WP No. 18546 of 2024 ORDER IN ORIGINAL BEARING OIO NO. 55/2023-24-SERVICE TAX, F.NO. GEXCOM/ADJN/ST/JC/1666/2021-ADJN-O/O PR COMMR- CGST-BENGALURU(W) DATED 31.07.2023 FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2016-17 AND 2017-18 (UPTO JUNE 2017) i.e., ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER On 15.09.2025, this Court passed the following order:

"A week's time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non prosecution.

In the event they stand complied as on today, those matters shall be listed on the ensuing days of the respective matters being given."

2.

Despite the said order, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections and consequently, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

Further, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to seek recalling/revival of this order, if the occasion so arise. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

BMC: List No.: 2 Sl No.: 34

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.