M/S Promoland vs. The Union Of INDIA

Original PDF →
WP/14589/2025HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01028258202515 October 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. MADHUKAR NADIG, ADVOCATE

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41385 WP No. 14589 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 14589 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S PROMOLAND NO.25, V N PLAZA, J NO.3RD STREET, BRIGADE CROSS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 025 (REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI. SHABU VASUDEVAN) REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT 2007 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MADHUKAR NADIG, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, (REVENUE) MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (KARNATAKA), VTK-1, KALIDASA ROAD, GANDHINAGAR, BENGLURU - 560 009. Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41385 WP No. 14589 of 2025 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, LGSTO-40, 1ST FLOOR, VTK-2, RAJENDRANAGAR, KORAMANGALA, BENGLURU - 560 047. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO HOLD AND DECLARE SECTION 16(2)(C) OF THE CGST ACT / KGST ACT TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND AGAINST THE SCHEME OF THE CGST ACT / KGST ACT.TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND / OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRITS TO BE READ DOWN SECTION 16(2)(c) OF THE CGST ACT / KGST ACTAND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER On 15.09.2025, this Court passed the following order:

"A week's time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non prosecution.

In the event they stand complied as on today, those matters shall be listed on the ensuing days of the respective matters being given."

2.

Despite the said order, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections even as on today and consequently, in view of the said peremptory order, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41385 WP No. 14589 of 2025

Further, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to seek recalling/revival of this order, if the occasion so arises. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

MDS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 27

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.