Shri Ajay Harlal Tyagi vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Central Tax
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “i) Issue a writ of certiorari or direction in the nature of a certiorari quashing the OEXCOM/AE/VRFN/TPD/146/ 2020-CGST-RANGE-B-DIV-9 Order in Original dated 14.06.2022 vide Order No.45/2021-22/AC/ED9 7074/2022 passed by Respondent No.1 i.e., the Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax bearing DIN No.20220657YT000000D747. Copy of the Order in Original vide Order No.45/2021-22/AC/ED9 dated 14.06.2022 is enclosed and marked as Annexure-A. ii) Issue a writ of certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the recovery of amount notice dated 26.09.2025 issued by the office of Respondent No.1 bearing DIN No.2025095700000000BDA 2741/25. Copy of the Recovery of amount notice dated 26.09.2025 is enclosed and marked as Annexure – A1. iii) And pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.” HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52176
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, the issue in controversy between the parties is directly and squarely covered by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s.Karnataka Chinmaya Seva Trust Vs. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax in WP No.11154/2023 & connected matters dated 03.07.2024, wherein it was held as under:
"
Accordingly, the following: ORDER In light of observations made above, the writ petitions relating to challenge to show-cause notice, such matters will stand relegated to the officers to be designated in terms of the observations made in para 8 above, at the same stage. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 5 in Column No.1 of the table relating to challenge to show-cause notice are disposed off.
Insofar as such writ petitions as detailed in Column 2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original, in light of the discussion made above, the Orders-in-Original stand set aside and the matters are relegated to the Officers to be designated to be reconsidered from the stage of show-cause notice. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 35 in Column No.2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original are disposed off.
The petitioners who are now relegated before the authorities concerned are at liberty to file their pleadings HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52176 within a reasonable time as may be fixed by the Officers concerned. Wherever the matters are pending in appeal in light of the arrangement that is made, petitioners to file a memo for withdrawal of appeal and accordingly, the orders-in-original in question would also receive the same treatment, i.e. be set aside as per the directions made above. Wherever demands have been made pursuant to the impugned orders, such proceedings are also set aside."
Under these circumstances, the present petition is also disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
Accordingly, the impugned Order-in-original at Annexure-A dated 14.06.2022 is hereby quashed.
The matter is remitted back to the concerned respondent to the stage of post show cause notice and to proceed further in accordance with law.
Ordered accordingly. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
SV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 45
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.