Borgwarner INDIA Technical Center Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax

WP/8940/2025HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01016926202518 December 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR6 pages
For Petitioner: SRI N MANOHAR, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI UNNIKRISHNAN M, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI MADANAN PILLAI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the present petition was directly covered by a previous decision of a Co-ordinate Bench. Consequently, the impugned Show Cause Notice and all further proceedings were quashed, and the respondent authorities were directed to refund the claimed amount.

Facts

The petitioner sought a declaration that Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017, was ultra vires and challenged an adjudication order rejecting their refund claim. The petitioner argued that their case was covered by a previous High Court judgment.

Key Issues

Whether Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017, is ultra vires the IGST Act and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a refund of IGST paid.

Sections Cited

Rule 96(10), Section 16, Section 22

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54230 WP No. 8940 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 8940 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN:

BORGWARNER INDIA TECHNICAL CENTER PRIVATE LIMITED, PLOT NO. 18 AND 19a, 19b, PRIMECO UNION CITY, 901, 9, G-01, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU 560 067. REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, DWARAKANATH VENKATESH SIMILI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI N MANOHAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, EAST DIVISION - 7, OLD AIRPORT ROAD, DOMMALURU, BENGALURU 560 071. 2. UNION OF INDIA, (REP. BY ITS SECRETARY) MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI-110 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI UNNIKRISHNAN M, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI MADANAN PILLAI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A). ISSUE A WRIT OF DECLARATION OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, DECLARING RULE 96(10) OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX RULES, 2017 AS ULTRA VIRES SECTIONS 16 AND 22 OF THE INTEGRATE

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.