Sri Syed Khaleel vs. State Of Karnataka
Held
The High Court, adopting a justice-oriented approach, set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to the respondent. The petitioner was granted one more opportunity to submit a reply to the show-cause notice.
Facts
The petitioner failed to submit a reply to a show-cause notice issued under Section 73 of the CGST/KGST Act due to bonafide reasons and unavoidable circumstances. Consequently, an order confirming CGST, SGST, penalty, and interest was passed.
Key Issues
Whether the petitioner should be granted another opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice despite failing to do so earlier due to alleged bonafide reasons.
Sections Cited
Section 73
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
NO.ZD29072406861 DATED 22.07.2024 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 WHEREIN HE HAS CONFIRMED CGST AND SGST OF RS.6,68,400/- ALONG WITH PENALTY OF RS 66,840/- AND INTEREST OF RS.4,51,170/- UNDER SECTION 73 OF THE KGST AND CGST/IGST FOR THE TAX PERIOD APRIL 2019 TO FEBRUARY 2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 22.07.202
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.