M/S J K Associates vs. The State Of Karnataka
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER The petitioner has sought for setting aside of the orders at Annexures-A and B passed under Section 73(9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax and Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short 'CGST/KGST Act') by respondent No.3 and has also sought for setting aside of the order at Annexure-C passed by respondent No.
All orders being orders of adjudication under Section 73(9) of the CGST/KGST Act.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that orders passed are required to be set aside as concurrent juri iction is exercised for the same period by different officers.
Sri. K. Hemakumar, learned Additional Government Advocate submits that if the petitioner had participated in the proceedings, the overlapping orders HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12850 WP No. 778 of 2026 perhaps could have been avoided and petitioner by his non-participation is responsible for passing of such multiple orders which are overlapping.
Having noticed the orders relating to the same period 2020-21, it would be appropriate to set aside the orders at Annexures-A, B and C and direct fresh adjudication in the hands of respondent No.
Petitioner to be present before respondent No.3 without further notice on 07.04.2026. 5. The petitioner to pay 10% of the demand of tax component in terms of the Summary Order at Annexure-B. Such payment to be made within 07.04.2026. Needless to state, such amount will be subject to adjudication.
Accordingly, petition is disposed of. All contentions are kept open. (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MCR
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.