Varanga Co-Operative Agricultural vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court allowed the petitioner's memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. The petitioner had filed an application under the "Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019" for settlement of the service tax dispute that formed the basis of the writ petition. The memo indicated that the application had been heard and orders were reserved. The Court granted permission to withdraw the writ petition, reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the writ petition in the event their application for settlement under the scheme is rejected. This decision was based on the petitioner's request and the pendency of the dispute resolution process under the aforementioned scheme.
Facts
The petitioner, Varanga Co-operative Agricultural Society Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court challenging a notice dated July 17, 2019, issued by the Superintendent of Central Excise & Central Tax (GST), Udupi. The notice pertained to a dispute concerning service tax. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner filed an application before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Central Tax, Udupi, under the "Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019" to settle the service tax dispute. The hearing for this application concluded, and orders were reserved.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition in light of their application filed under the "Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019" for settlement of the service tax dispute, with liberty to revive the petition if the application is rejected. Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that they have availed the "Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019" to resolve the service tax dispute which is the subject matter of the writ petition. They sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to revive it if their application for settlement is rejected. Revenue's contention: The judgment does not record any specific contention from the revenue or state regarding the withdrawal of the petition. However, the court granted permission based on the petitioner's memo.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition and the same reads as under;
“During the pendency
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.