Kodavoor Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha vs. Union Of INDIA

WP/47669/2019HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01030416201917 December 2019Bench: S.SUJATHA3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI MAHESH R. UPPIN, ADVFor Respondent: SRI JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, CGC
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's submission that they had filed an application under the "Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019" for the settlement of the service tax dispute. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the writ petition in the event their application for settlement is rejected. The operative direction was to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn with the liberty granted.

Facts

The petitioner, Kodavoor Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha Niyamitha, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court challenging two notices dated July 10, 2019, and August 2, 2019, both issued by the Superintendent of Central Excise & Central Tax (GST), Udupi (Respondent No. 2). The notices pertained to a dispute concerning service tax. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner filed an application before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Central Tax, Udupi, under the "Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019" to settle the service tax dispute. The application was heard, and orders were reserved.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition in light of their application filed under the "Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019"? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner argued that they have filed an application under the "Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019" for the settlement of the dispute that is the subject matter of the writ petition. They sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, reserving liberty to revive it if their settlement application is rejected. Revenue's Argument: The judgment does not record any specific argument from the revenue or state regarding the withdrawal of the petition. However, the learned standing counsel for the respondents accepted notice.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.47669/2019 (T – RES) BETWEEN : KODAVOOR VYAVASAYA SEVA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA 16-62, KODAVOOR, POST KODAVOOR, UDUPI – 576 106. REPRESENTED Y ITS C.E.O.:Sri. SUDHAKAR. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI MAHESH R. UPPIN, ADV.) AND : 1 . UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CENTRAL EXCISE AND CENTRAL TAX, NEW DELHI, BY ITS SECRETARY 2 . SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CENTRAL TAX (GST), WEST RANGE, VISHNU PRIYA BUILDING, L.B.S. MARG, AJJARKAD, UDUPI-576 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, CGC.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 10.07.2019 ISSUED BY THE R-2 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND THE NOTICE DATED 02.08.2019 ISSUED BY THE R-2 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-B. - 2 - THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

Sri. Jeevan J Neeralagi, learned standing counsel accepts notice for

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.