M/S A P Steels vs. Additional Director General

WP/8586/2020HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01019491202027 July 2020Bench: P.B.BAJANTHRI7 pages
For Petitioner: Sri.K.G.Kamath and Smt. Veena J Kamath, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Sri.Jeevan J.Neeralgi, Advocate for R1 Vide order dated 15.07.2020, R-2 is held sufficient
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the provisional attachment order, issued under Section 83 of the CGST Act, had ceased to have effect after the expiry of one year from the date of the order, i.e., May 27, 2020. Therefore, the attachment was no longer valid when the petition was filed.

Facts

The petitioners challenged a provisional attachment of their bank accounts made on May 28, 2019, under Section 83 of the CGST Act. The petition was filed on June 22, 2020, after the one-year period of attachment had expired.

Key Issues

Whether a provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act remains valid after the expiry of its one-year statutory period. The court also considered if the attachment order was still in effect when the petition was filed.

Sections Cited

Section 83

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.8586/2020 (GM RES)

BETWEEN:

1.

M/S.A.P.Steels

Having its office at:

Shop No.1, Sri Vyasa Mahaganapathi Temple,

Ganapathi Nagar,

Rajgopal Nagar Main Road,

Peenya 3rd Phase, Bengaluru-560 058

Represented by Proprietor

Sri.Sanjay Kumar Mishra

2.

Sri.Sanjay Kumar Mishra,

S/o Chandra Shekar Mishra

Aged about 45 years

Residing at: No.302, 3rd Floor,

Prestige Richmond Apartments,

Bengaluru-560 027

… Petitioners (By Sri.K.G.Kamath and Smt. Veena J Kamath, Advocates)

AND:

1.

Additional Director General

DGCI, Bangalore Zonal Unit,

No.112, “S.P.Enclave”,

Adjacent to Karnataka Bank,

K.H.Road, Bengaluru-560 043. 2

2.

IDBI Bank,

IDBI House, 58 Mission Road,

Bengaluru-560 027

Represented its Manager

... Respondents (By Sri.Jeevan J.Neeralgi, Advocate for R1 Vide order dated 15.07.2020, R-2 is held sufficient)

This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.