M/S Urbanize Developers INDIA Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
Held
The Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation with the new jurisdictional officer. This officer is mandated to consider the representation expeditiously within six weeks.
Facts
The petitioner's GST electronic ledger was blocked after they filed their GSTR-3B for March 2019 late, availing credit belatedly. The petitioner made representations to the respondent to unblock the ledger.
Key Issues
Whether the GST electronic ledger can be blocked without recording reasons, and if belatedly availed input credit is permissible subject to late fees.
Sections Cited
Section 16[4], Rule 86A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The petitioner, a private limited company which is registered with GST Authori
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.