M/S. Zainab Trading vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes

WP/13308/2020HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01035025202027 November 2020Bench: B M SHYAM PRASAD3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. K. M. SHIVAYOGISWAMY., ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI.HEMA KUMAR.K., AGA FOR R1
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court noted that the learned Additional Government Advocate for the first respondent placed on record a communication dated October 22, 2020, stating that all garnishee notices in Form DRC-13 have been withdrawn, subject to further proceedings. The Court observed that if the garnishee notices are withdrawn, the writ petition would become infructuous. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition. The petitioner was granted liberty, subject to all just exceptions, to have proper recourse in the event of any further notices in Form DRC-13. The Court did not decide on the legality or validity of the original notice or attachment, as the matter was rendered infructuous by the withdrawal.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Zainab Trading, represented by its proprietor Wasim Ahmed, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court. The petition challenged a notice issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (R1) under Section 79(c) of the KGST Act, 2017, in Form GST DRC-13, dated September 12, 2019. The petitioner also challenged a message received from the State Bank of India (R2) dated January 10, 2020, indicating the attachment of the petitioner's bank account. The Assistant Commissioner is the authority that passed the order under challenge. The amount in dispute is not explicitly stated.

Key Issues

1. Whether the garnishee notice issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in Form GST DRC-13, dated September 12, 2019, and the subsequent attachment of the petitioner's bank account by the State Bank of India, are valid and legal, particularly in light of the petitioner's challenge under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Contentions: Petitioner: Argued that the garnishee notice and bank account attachment were illegal and sought their quashing. The petitioner relied on the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Revenue (Respondent No. 1): Did not present arguments on the merits of the case. Instead, placed on record a communication stating that all garnishee notices in Form DRC-13 were withdrawn, subject to further proceedings.

Sections Cited

Section 79(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 13308/2020(T/RES)

BETWEEN :

M/S. ZAINAB TRADING NO.A-26, HMT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE JALAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 013. (REPRESENTED BY ITS PROP WASIM AHMED AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS) ... PETITIONER (By SRI. K. M. SHIVAYOGISWAMY., ADVOCATE)

AND :

1.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES LGSTO-065, KIADB BUILDING PEENYA 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 058. 2. THE MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA 361, BY 1089, 1ST STAGE, II PHASE HMT MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 054. ... RESPONDENTS (By SRI.HEMA KUMAR.K., AGA FOR R1)

2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT U/S 79(c) THE KGST ACT, 2017 IN FORM GST DRC-13 BEARING NO.GST/T.NO.357/2019-20 DATED 12.09.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE “H”. AND IMPUGNED MESSAGE RECEIVED FROM THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 10.01.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE “K” ATTACHING PE

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.