Shri. Gajendra V vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The High Court disposed of the writ petition in terms of its previous order in Writ Petition No. 3938/2021 and connected matters, dated August 11, 2021. The specific findings or reasoning of the prior judgment were not detailed in this order, but it was accepted by both parties that the present case was covered by it. The operative direction was to dispose of the writ petition in a similar manner as the aforementioned writ petition. No specific amount in dispute was mentioned, nor were any specific GST provisions discussed in this particular order, other than the general context of Central Tax.
Facts
The petitioner, Shri. Gajendra V., an Executive Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court. The petition challenged an order dated December 13, 2019, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Bengaluru Bench, in O.A. No. 170/01070/2019. The petitioner sought to set aside this CAT order. The respondents were the Union of India, the Central Board of Excise & Customs (CBEC) & GST, and the Principal Chief Commissioner of Central Tax, Bangalore.
Key Issues
1. Whether the order dated December 13, 2019, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 170/01070/2019 is liable to be set aside? The petitioner argued for setting aside the CAT order. The respondents did not record any specific arguments in the judgment, but their counsel appeared. The parties' counsel jointly submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by a previous order of the High Court in Writ Petition No. 3938/2021 and connected matters, dated August 11, 2021 (Anju Kumar Pintu and Others v/s Union of India and others).
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO.15431/2021 (S-CAT) BETWEEN:
SHRI. GAJENDRA V., S/O VENKATARAMANAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX AUDIT-1 COMMISSIONERATE 2ND FLOOR, TTMC, BMTC BUS STAND BUILDING BANASHANKARI, BENGALURU-560 070. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANGANNAVAR GIRISH BABURAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVT., MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE & CUSTOMS (CBEC) & GST, BY ITS CHAIRMAN NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, BANGALORE, P.B.NO.5400 CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING
QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. … RESPONDENTS [BY SMT. RESHMA K. THAMMAIAH, CGC., FOR R1 (VIDEO CONFERENCE) SRI. B.PRAMOD, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 (VIDEO CONFERENCE)]
2
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF I
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.