Mr Tanveer Abdul Ghani vs. The Arch Bishop & Titular Head Of
Held
The Court held that the compromise petition filed under Section 89(1) read with Order XXIII Rule 3 and Section 151 of the CPC, entered into between the petitioner and respondent No.1, is just and proper. The Court accepted the compromise. The terms of the compromise stipulated that the petitioner would vacate and hand over vacant possession of the suit schedule 'A' property on or before 31.10.2023, without requiring the respondent to file an execution petition. The petitioner also agreed to pay rent at the rate of Rs. 20,066 per month, excluding GST, from the date of the order until 31.10.2023 or until vacant possession is handed over. The possession of suit schedule 'B' property had already been handed over. Consequently, the impugned Judgment and Decree passed by the Trial Court in S.C. No. 330/2018 was modified in terms of the compromise petition. The Revision Petition was disposed of in terms of the compromise.
Facts
The petitioner, Mr. Tanveer Abdul Ghani, was a tenant in properties described as 'A' and 'B' since 2008, paying a monthly rent of Rs. 13,920, with annual 5% increments. His tenancy was terminated, leading to an eviction suit (S.C. No. 330/2018) filed by the respondent, The Archbishop & Titular Head of Bengaluru, represented by its GPA holder and authorized signatory. The Small Causes Court decreed the eviction. The petitioner filed a Civil Revision Petition (CRP No. 387/2019) challenging this decree. During the pendency of the revision, the parties filed a compromise petition under Section 89(1) read with Order XXIII Rule 3 and Section 151 of the CPC.
Key Issues
1. Whether the compromise entered into between the petitioner and respondent No.1 is just and proper, and should be accepted by the Court? Petitioner's arguments: The petitioner argued that a compromise has been reached with respondent No.1, detailing the terms of vacating the premises and payment of rent. The petitioner agreed to vacate the suit schedule 'A' property by 31.10.2023 and pay a revised rent of Rs. 20,066 per month (excluding GST) until vacating. Possession of suit schedule 'B' property has already been handed over. Revenue/State's arguments: The respondent (landlord) has agreed to the terms of the compromise, indicating their acceptance of the proposed settlement regarding possession and rent payment.
Sections Cited
Section 89(1), Order XXIII Rule 3, Section 151
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.387/2019 (SC)
BETWEEN:
MR. TANVEER ABDUL GHANI S/O LATE ABDUL GHANI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.26/A, MILLER ROAD CROSS BENSON TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 046. ALSO AT: AUDIO SHACK, UNIT NO.17 AND 19, ST. PATRICK'S COMPOUND, B BLOCK, BRIGADE ROAD, BANGALORE-560025
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAGHUNATH M.D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE ARCH BISHOP & TITULAR HEAD OF BENGALURU, MOST REV. DR.BERNARD MORAS ST. PATRICKS CHURCH NO.15-K, BRIGADE ROAD SHANTHALA NAGAR, ASHOK NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 025 REP. BY ITS GPA HOLDER REV. MSGR. C. FRANCIS S/O SRI CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
2 BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI. P. JOSEPH, S/O SRI C. FRANCIS AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, WORKING AS MANAGER, ST. PATRICK'S COMPLEX #15K, BRIGADE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 025. 2. MR. ABDUL REHMAN S/O LATE A.M. AHMED AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, #37/12, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU - 560 052
ALSO AT: AUDIO SHACK UNIT NO.17 & 19 ST. PATRICK'S COMPLEX 'B' BLOCK, BRIGADE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 025.
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.