M/S Akshaya Agro Sales PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA

Original PDF →
WP/3754/2022HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01007814202218 February 2022Bench: S SUNIL DUTT YADAV4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI J.N. NAVEEN, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3, R5 & R6; SRI HEMA KUMAR, AGA FOR R4, R7 TO R9

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.3754/2022 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. AKSHAYA AGRO SALES PVT. LTD., NO.7, 1ST FLOOR, ROOPA COMPLEX, 3RD MAIN, CHAMARAJAPETE, BANGALORE - 560 018 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI S.C. MURTHY. … PETITIONER (BY SRI J.N. NAVEEN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS REVENUE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE 128-A/NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 011. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN 128-A/NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI - 110 011. 3. THE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL, FIFTH FLOOR, TOWER-II, JEEVAN BHARTI BUILDING JANAPATH ROAD, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2 4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA FINANCE DEPARTMENT THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560 001 BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 5. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES, BANGALORE EAST C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001. 6. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES EAST DIVISION - 7, BANGALORE EAST COMMISSIONERATE BMTC BUS STAND HAL AIRPORT ROAD, DOMLUR BANGALORE - 560 071. 7. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, BANGALORE - 560 027. 8. LGSTO-100, CHAMARAJPETE BANGALORE - 560 018. 9. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES GANDHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 009. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3, R5 & R6; SRI HEMA KUMAR, AGA FOR R4, R7 TO R9) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO FILE REVISED RETURN TRAN-1 AND ALSO TO FILE TRAN-2 IN GST PORTAL 3 EITHER ELECTRONICALLY OR MANUALLY EXTENDING THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED UNDER THE RULE 117 OF CGST RULES R/W SECTION 140 OF CGST ACT, 2017 BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER MARKED AT ANNEXURES-B, B1 AND B2 TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Petitioner is stated to be a trader of agricultural seeds and has been registered for service tax vide GST No.229AAGCA2447M1ZU. Petitioner further submits that it was also registered with central excise authority and had sought to avail of benefit of input credit, excise and duty value on the unsold inventory which was carried forward into the GST regime.

2.

Petitioner submits that they had filed return in TRAN-1 on 20.11.2017. It is further submitted that the petitioner was unable to file revised return in TRAN-2 in light of the technical glitch.

3.

Learned Additional Government Advocate who has accepted notice for respondents 4, 7 to 9 and Sri. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, who has accepted notice for the other

4 respondents submit that in light of the factual matrix as made out, the matter could be disposed off taking note of the order passed in W.P.No.4241/2021 and connected matters which was affirmed by the Division Bench in W.A.No.461/2020 and 18/2021. 4. Accordingly, in light of the identical factual matrix having been dealt with in the above mentioned orders, writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to permit the petitioner to file revised TRAN-2 either electronically or manually on or before the expiry of 30 days from release of the order. JUDGE

VP

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.