Smt. Deepika Kapoor vs. Asst Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes

WP/15105/2020HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01036467202024 June 2022Bench: M.I.ARUN2 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. SHETTY BABU RANGAPPA, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. K. HEMAKUMAR, AGA FOR R1
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, Smt. Deepika Kapoor, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court challenging an assessment order demanding GST of Rs. 1,24,454 along with interest and penalty. The petitioner also sought to set aside the attachment of her savings bank account bearing number 1333101240306, maintained with Canara Bank, Mangalore. The respondent was the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, LGSTO-270, Mangalore. The petition was listed for orders, and the court noted that the petitioner was either taking time or continuously remaining absent, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the writ petition.

Held

The Court held that the writ petition was to be dismissed for non-prosecution. The reasoning was based on the observation that the petitioner was either taking time or continuously remaining absent, which indicated a lack of interest in prosecuting the writ petition. Consequently, the Court found no reason to proceed with the merits of the case concerning the assessment order or the attachment of the bank account. The operative direction was the dismissal of the writ petition. No issues were expressly left undecided; the decision was solely on the procedural aspect of non-prosecution.

Key Issues

1. Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution, considering the petitioner's absence and apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter? The petitioner's side argued for the setting aside of the assessment order and the attachment of the bank account. However, the petitioner was absent during the hearing. The revenue's side, represented by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, would have likely argued for the dismissal of the petition on grounds of non-prosecution, given the petitioner's repeated absences. No specific statutory provisions or precedents were explicitly discussed in relation to the petitioner's arguments due to their absence.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.15105 OF 2020 (T-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. DEEPIKA KAPOOR, W/O ASHOK KAPOOR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.301 'B' BLOCK, RANKA PLAZA, NEAR KTHOMAS BAKERY FRAZER TOWN, VTC, BENGALURU- … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHETTY BABU RANGAPPA, ADVOCATE) (ABSENT). AND: 1. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES LGSTO-270- MANGALORE - 575001. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, CANARA BANK, BALMATTA BRANCH, BALMATTA ROAD, MANGALORE-575 001. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, DHANALAKSHMI BANK, NEW NO.52(OLD NO.745), 33RD CROSS ROAD, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 011. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. HEMAKUMAR, AGA FOR R1) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

DEMAND GST OF RS.1,24,454 ALONG WITH INTEREST AND PENALTY ANNEXURE-j1, SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED PROVISIONS ATTACHMENT OF THE SAVING BANK ACCOUNT BEARING NO.1333101240306 OF THE PETITIONER M

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.