M/S M K Agrotech Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →WP/5196/2020HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01009436202030 September 2022Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR2 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. P. B. HARISH, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 & R4; SRI. A. RAMESH GOWDA, HCGP FOR R3
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.5196 OF 2020 [T-RES]
BETWEEN:
M/S M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMTIED
389 M B ROAD KAVERI LAYOUT
SRIRANGAPATNA
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR DESIGNATION,
MOHAMMED IMRAN KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
S/O SUBHAN KHAN
R/AT NO. 04, 2ND MAIN, C LAYOUT
BANNIMANTAP, MYSORE -570 015.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. P. B. HARISH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA
THROUGH THE SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
NO.137, NORTH BLOCK,
NEW DELHI - 110 001.
2.
THE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
COUNCIL (GST COUNCIL)
THE SECRETARY,
OFFICE OF THE GST COUNCIL SECRETARIAT,
5TH FLOOR, TOWER II, JEEVAN BHARTI BUILDING,
JANPATH ROAD, CONNAUGHT PLACE,
NEW DELHI - 110 001.
3.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT,
THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2
4.
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES
BANNIMANTAP DIVISION, MYSORE
S1 AND S2, VINAYA MARGA
SIDDHARTHA NAGAR, MYSORE - 570 011.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 & R4;
SRI. A. RAMESH GOWDA, HCGP FOR R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION HOLDING
AND DECLARING THAT RULE 89(5) OF THE CENTRAL GOODS
AND SERVICES TAX RULES 2017 ARE ULTRA-VIRES SECTION 54
AND
THE
AMENDMENT
VIDE
NOTIFICATION
NO.21/2018
CENTRAL TAX DATED APRIL 18, 2018 WHICH WAS MADE
RETROSPECTIVE VIDE NOTIFICATION NO.26/2018 CENTRAL
TAX DTATED JUNE 13, 2018 IS EX CACIE ULTRA VIRES THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT 2017 KARNATAKA
GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT 2017 AND INTEGRATED
GOODS AND SERVICE ACT 2017 AND IS WITHOUT AUTHORITY
OF
LAW
MANIFESTLY
UNREASONABLE
DISCRIMINATORY
ILLEGAL AND VOID .
THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the petition.
The submission is placed on record.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE AN/-
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.