M/S. Bluestone Jewellery And vs. Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →WP/641/2020HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01055672201930 September 2022Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. G.L. MOHAN MAIYA, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI.A. RAMESH GOWDA, HCGP FOR R4; SRI. B.S. VENKATANARAYANA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.641 OF 2020 [T-RES]
BETWEEN:
M/S BLUESTONE JEWELLERY AND
LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED
SITE NO.89/2, LAVA KUSHA
ARCADE, MUNNEKOLAL VILLAGE,
OUTER RING ROAD,
MARATHAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560037
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,
GAURAV SINGH KUSHWAHA,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
S/O SHIVRAJ SINGH KUSHWAHA.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. G.L. MOHAN MAIYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA
THROUGH THE SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
NO.137, NORTH BLOCK,
NEW DELHI-110001.
2.
UNION OF INDIA
THE SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE,
4TH FLOOR,
A WING, RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD,
SHASTRI BHAVAN,
NEW DELHI-110001.
3.
THE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
COUNCIL (GST COUNCIL)
THE SECRETARY,
OFFICE OF THE GST
2
COUNCIL SECRETARIAT,
5TH FLOOR, TOWER II,
JEEVAN BHARTI BUILDING,
JANPATH ROAD,
CONNAUGHT PLACE,
NEW DELHI-110001.
4.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.A. RAMESH GOWDA, HCGP FOR R4;
SRI. B.S. VENKATANARAYANA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT
RULE 89 (5) OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
RULES, 2017, AS AMENDED VIDE NTOIFICATION NO.21/2018 -
CENTERAL TAX DATED APRIL 18, 2018 AND NOTIFICATION
26/2018 - CENTRAL TAX DATED JUNE, 13 2018, VIDE ANENXURE-
A AND B TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SAID PROVISIONS DENIES
GRANT OF REFUND OF UNUTILISED TAX CREDIT IN RESPECT
OF TAX PAID ON INPUT SERVICES, IS EX FACIE ULTRA VIRES
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 AND IS
WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW, MANIFESTLY UNREASONABLE,
DISCRIMINATORY, ILLEGAL AND VOID.
THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
3
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo praying for permission to withdraw the petition.
The memo is placed on record.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE
AN/-
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.