Mr Keshava vs. Union Of INDIA

Original PDF →
WP/23281/2022HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01053642202213 January 2023Bench: B M SHYAM PRASAD4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. GOVINDRAYA KAMATH K., ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. HEMAKUMAR K, AGA

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - WP No. 23281 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 23281 OF 2022 (T-RES) BETWEEN: MR KESHAVA S/O SRI SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.92, YATHAGADAHALLI, MANDYA 571422. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOVINDRAYA KAMATH K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110001 2. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETRY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - WP No. 23281 of 2022 CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS GST POLICY WING, NEW DELHI 110002. 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 4. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (KARNATAKA) VINIJYA TERIGE KARYALA-1, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560009. 5. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER(VIGILANCE)-10 3RD FLOOR, VANIJYA TERIGE KARYALAYA-2, A BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560047. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HEMAKUMAR K, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE IMPUGNED SECTION 130 OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT “CGST ACT,” 2017 AND SECTION 130 OF THE KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT “KGST ACT”, 2017 AS ILLEGAL, ULTRA VIRES AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 14, 19, AND 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA; SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF CONFISCATION BEARING NO JCCT (VIG)/CTO (VIGILANCE)-10/DTN-11/2020-21 DATED 19.11.2020 AS PER ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY THE R5 U/S 130 OF THE KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT KGST ACT 2017 AND U/S 130 OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT CGST ACT, 2017/U/S 20 OF THE INTEGRATED GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017/U/S 11 O THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (COMPENSATION TO STATES) ACT, 2017, AS FAR AS THE CONFISCATION OF THE GOODS CONVEYANCE OF THE PETITIONER. - 3 - WP No. 23281 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The petitioner has called in question the order of confiscation dated 19.11.2020 passed by the fifth respondent [Annexure-E] under Section 130 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It is undisputed that the fifth respondent can consider the request for release of the vehicle only if there is adjudication on the petitioner’s connivance in, or the knowledge of, the misuse of the registered vehicle. The petitioner is the registered owner who has made over the subject vehicle to a transporter.

In similar circumstances, this Court has granted leave to the concerned to file appropriate affidavit before the fifth respondent to place on record the circumstances that would belie any connivance by the petitioner in, or the petitioner’s knowledge of, the misuse of the vehicle while calling upon the fifth respondent to pass suitable orders in the light of such affidavit. WP No. 23281 of 2022

This Court is of the considered view that the petitioner must be granted liberty to file such affidavit before the fifth respondent and call upon the fifth respondent to pass suitable orders in accordance with law within the timeframe.

Hence the following: ORDER

The petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file affidavit with the fifth respondent as aforesaid on or before 30.01.2023 and calling upon the fifth respondent to pass suitable orders as aforesaid in accordance with law within ten [10] days there from. JUDGE

RB

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.